Michael Casher is taking a break from blogging until after the new year. He wishes everyone a safe and happy holiday season.
Science fiction author Michael Casher reviews randomly selected events from the last century. Coauthored by Baby Boomer Boy, Random Retro Reviews of the 20th Century pulls no punches, giving you "their slant" on landmark events, the famous and the infamous, the culture
and the culture clash of the 20th Century.
Sunday, December 02, 2007
Saturday, December 01, 2007
Big Wheels
Being ambivalent about most things allows me the freedom to sit on the fence for a spell and see both sides of the pasture. Then I don't have to jump off unprepared and step in the manure. That's the way I like it.
When I look back on America’s love affair with the automobile in the mid-20th Century, what I remember most about it was that it was both a wonderful thing and a ridiculous social phenomenon at the same time. But it was a great time to be alive and your car was as much a part of who and what you were as anything else and most Americans wouldn't have it any other way.
Cars in the 1950s and 1960s were very distinctive looking and there was a lot to look at. Not like the clones today, which are first designed in the wind tunnel for fuel efficiency and then copycat designed for style, with that cowardly fear of losing a particular market share as the second driving force. Back then, however, no one gave a damn about gas mileage and, back in the Fifties and Sixties, being different was an automaker’s key to marketing success.
Fins were in, especially on Cadillacs, Chryslers and Plymouths, despite the fact that they served no aerodynamic function whatsoever. But they looked really cool to me, as a kid growing up at that time, like fins on a rocket ship. Today they would look nothing but ridiculous but I’d love to see them make a comeback. Along with the fender. And, while they’re at it, they might as well throw in the running board. It made a great step for kids and older people.
And, man, did these big, boxy babies have real power steering and power brakes or what? You could literally stop on a dime if you touched that big-ass brake with anything more than just your toe. And you could steer a 1962 Pontiac Catalina (pictured) with only one finger. I once saw a man steer his 1962 Dodge Coronet with just his nose.
A lot of the cars in the 1950s and 1960s also rode like Cadillacs. Hell, just about all of them. They had big, sixteen-inch, bias-ply tires, a massive chassis and thick-rolled bodies that made some of these cars weigh in at two tons or more. I could lay down in the back seat of the 1968 Buick Wildcat I bought in 1980 as a grown man. And my head and feet never touched either door.
I miss the bench seat in front and the shifter on the steering column. That’s back in the days when the ignition key went into a slot on the dashboard. Right next to the Delco radio and the glove compartment with a lock on the door and a light inside. It was big enough to hold your lunch.
I think about those cars a lot these days and I pine away for one every time I squeeze into my aging 2000 Daewoo Lanos and bump my head on the rearview mirror and skin my knee on the door handle. But at least it still hasn’t rusted in the seven years I’ve been driving it. And that’s worth an awful lot to me.
When I look back on America’s love affair with the automobile in the mid-20th Century, what I remember most about it was that it was both a wonderful thing and a ridiculous social phenomenon at the same time. But it was a great time to be alive and your car was as much a part of who and what you were as anything else and most Americans wouldn't have it any other way.
Cars in the 1950s and 1960s were very distinctive looking and there was a lot to look at. Not like the clones today, which are first designed in the wind tunnel for fuel efficiency and then copycat designed for style, with that cowardly fear of losing a particular market share as the second driving force. Back then, however, no one gave a damn about gas mileage and, back in the Fifties and Sixties, being different was an automaker’s key to marketing success.
Fins were in, especially on Cadillacs, Chryslers and Plymouths, despite the fact that they served no aerodynamic function whatsoever. But they looked really cool to me, as a kid growing up at that time, like fins on a rocket ship. Today they would look nothing but ridiculous but I’d love to see them make a comeback. Along with the fender. And, while they’re at it, they might as well throw in the running board. It made a great step for kids and older people.
And, man, did these big, boxy babies have real power steering and power brakes or what? You could literally stop on a dime if you touched that big-ass brake with anything more than just your toe. And you could steer a 1962 Pontiac Catalina (pictured) with only one finger. I once saw a man steer his 1962 Dodge Coronet with just his nose.
A lot of the cars in the 1950s and 1960s also rode like Cadillacs. Hell, just about all of them. They had big, sixteen-inch, bias-ply tires, a massive chassis and thick-rolled bodies that made some of these cars weigh in at two tons or more. I could lay down in the back seat of the 1968 Buick Wildcat I bought in 1980 as a grown man. And my head and feet never touched either door.
I miss the bench seat in front and the shifter on the steering column. That’s back in the days when the ignition key went into a slot on the dashboard. Right next to the Delco radio and the glove compartment with a lock on the door and a light inside. It was big enough to hold your lunch.
I think about those cars a lot these days and I pine away for one every time I squeeze into my aging 2000 Daewoo Lanos and bump my head on the rearview mirror and skin my knee on the door handle. But at least it still hasn’t rusted in the seven years I’ve been driving it. And that’s worth an awful lot to me.
Labels:
1950s,
1960s,
automobiles,
Cadillac,
muscle cars,
Plymouth,
Pontiac,
power steering
Friday, November 16, 2007
“Leave it to Beaver” in 25 Words or Less
This was a 1950's TV sitcom about a brainless boy repeatedly getting into trouble and exasperating his clueless, micro-managing parents and his too-perfect-to-be-real older brother.
Labels:
classic TV,
Leave it to Beaver,
television,
TV
Saturday, November 03, 2007
The Frisbee in 25 Words or Less
Playing catch with a little, plastic, flying saucer replaced baseball as the national pastime for youngsters in the 1960s and 1970s. Now dogs could play.
Saturday, October 06, 2007
The In Crowd Through The Peephole
I’m going to take a big stab in the dark and suggest that the first idolized members of the American “In Crowd” were quite possibly those who disdained the boredom and responsibility of middle-class life back in the 1920s. These were the devil-may-care folks who ran with one another in a futile quest for rebellious fun that would somehow prove to be worth all the effort of deliberately trying not to fit into the everyday social landscape.
These were the people for whom the prohibition of alcohol meant very little, or nothing at all, and to whom listening and dancing to “devil music” was a freedom they felt they somehow had to earn. Most of the older folks back then, who had to stay home and keep up appearances, were Jazz Era wannabes, moms and dads who would have dropped that broom and apron and abandoned that pipe and those slippers in a New York minute (how I hate that phrase and that’s why I just had to use it here) for a chance to imbibe bathtub gin and cut a rug with someone other than their spouses.
For my money, this is where and when the “In Crowd” cut its teeth. In the “Speakeasy” world of Prohibition. And had I lived back then, I, too, would have been one of them. For me, it would have been mainly for the jazz but also for the beer and Canadian whiskey the holier-than-thou feds should have kept their stupid paws off in the first place. But, for me, it wouldn't have been an effort on my part to be “in” or to “be cool”. For my money, that’s always been a low priority, if not a total waste of time.
Before the Keepers of the Cool were alluded to as “The In Crowd”, they began cutting their wisdom teeth in the basement nightclubs of New York and Los Angeles as part of the 1950's “too cool to care” Beat generation. That would be those goatee-sporting wannabe poets and the long-haired mavens who played flute that they ran with, all wearing trademark black clothing, including the omnipresent black French beret. These rebels were more about being rebellious, in my opinion, than the Jazz Era fun junkies of the Roaring Twenties. But the Beatniks didn’t need to sneak out of the house to act "cool" and be deliberately unfathomable. They were like that at home, too.
Then along came the infamous Sixties where youths, like me, decided that it was high time to turn the world upside down and inside out under the guise of political and social responsibility. Yeah, right. The truth of the matter was that college students of that decade simply wanted to have fun with alcohol, drugs, sex, and loud music while just pretending to have a socially-responsible bone in their bodies. What the hippies and yippies and "freaks" of the 1960s inadvertently caused, however, was the birth of the most famous “In Crowd” of all time. That was the phenomenon called the “Jet Set”.
The "Jet Set" were people (mostly from Beverly Hills, Aspen and The Hamptons) who had so much money and so little time for continued observance of those damn boring American values that the USA was built on that they flew all around the world repeatedly without a mental flight plan just to prove that they could. These people were the parings that were left after the Big Apple was carved up by television and publishing movers-and-shakers who at least did something tangible with their time and money. The unwritten code of the new “In Crowd” was to spend money like it was water and hope that those who were merely middle-class and who lived in the “fly-over country” between New York and L.A. would dare to idolize you instead of wanting you dead.
The “In Crowd” in the 1980s did their bogeying in hotspots like Xenon in New York and their chomping at trendy troughs like Spago in Los Angeles, again in the hopes that their “being cool” was being noticed and worth the all the effort of getting “dressed up” or “dressed down” and spending all that money on door covers, expensive cocktails and food with European names that looked like art on their dinner plates. The “In Crowd” of the 1980s took shallowness to a new level. Their turned-up collars, pushed-up jacket sleeves, glitter makeup and shocking hairdos were part of their visual trademark of not wanting to be like everyone else. Unfortunately, when half the world thinks you’re cool as hell and copies everything you do and say, your coolness begins to wear thin, especially when the “In Crowd” moved to the high schools and shopping malls of the 1990s, where everyone was equal.
This blog is not about the 21st Century but I’ll venture to guess that members of “The In Crowd” in the new millennium are youths comprising the "inked" generation who flock to tattoo parlors the way their great-grandparents flocked to speakeasy nightclubs during Prohibition. These are the sons and daughters who have turned the movie-going experience into a confusing battle between Surround Sound and the high-contrast nano-second images of bellybuttons and butt cracks, a digital vying for what’s left of your caffeine-kicked and sugar-laden mind.
“The In Crowd” somehow grew and grew during the latter portion of the 20th Century until it's now the bigger part of who we are as Americans. That’s the part of us that rebels against just about everything we were once taught and told. How this can be any degree of “cool” is a mystery I, myself, may never fathom.
Monday, September 03, 2007
The First Great Big War
Before the world started numbering its global conflicts, the war in Europe that began on August 1, 1914 when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, was called ‘The Great War” by the many hapless soldiers who fought in it, not World War I. Of course, the word “great” meant “on a grand scale” or “bigger than normal” back then. That kind of thing. Not “wonderful”, as the word “great” is often misused today.
The underlying cause of this so-called “Great War” was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the presumed heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian empire. This touchy, rich and spoiled prick was shot and killed by a Serbian assassin in Sarajevo, Yugoslavia on June 28th, 1914. Apparently, this royal jerk had slapped some touchy and defensive Serbian prick beforehand with his royal gloves, an act which, naturally, demanded retribution in the archaic, Old World tradition of vengeance. Of course, this cause-and-effect has never been verified. But it sure sounds like a good reason for Neanderthal thinkers to start a great big war.
What ensued after the declaration of war against Serbia by Austria-Hungary was a war on a scale the world had never seen before. And that was because Germany saw an opportunity to turn this local European conflict into wartime prosperity. Hell, nothing boosts a country’s economy like a long, dragged out war. And World War I was certainly that.
Costing $186 billion (don’t forget, this was between 1914 and 1918, when a dollar was worth 100 cents and not 2 cents) and eventually involving 32 nations, the lives of over 8.5 million people, with 22 million more people wounded, “The Great War” may have been stylish as hell for the British and German officers who fought in this grand exhibition of nationalism (called “patriotism” today) but it was a four-year hell for the rest of the world.
Germany — a nation that needed to be squashed like a bug for its deadly, evil opportunism — would pull a similar stunt in 1939 when it would invade Poland and start World War II, an even greater war that would leave over 52 million people dead worldwide.
Say, is there an Act Three in this great big show?
The underlying cause of this so-called “Great War” was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the presumed heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian empire. This touchy, rich and spoiled prick was shot and killed by a Serbian assassin in Sarajevo, Yugoslavia on June 28th, 1914. Apparently, this royal jerk had slapped some touchy and defensive Serbian prick beforehand with his royal gloves, an act which, naturally, demanded retribution in the archaic, Old World tradition of vengeance. Of course, this cause-and-effect has never been verified. But it sure sounds like a good reason for Neanderthal thinkers to start a great big war.
What ensued after the declaration of war against Serbia by Austria-Hungary was a war on a scale the world had never seen before. And that was because Germany saw an opportunity to turn this local European conflict into wartime prosperity. Hell, nothing boosts a country’s economy like a long, dragged out war. And World War I was certainly that.
Costing $186 billion (don’t forget, this was between 1914 and 1918, when a dollar was worth 100 cents and not 2 cents) and eventually involving 32 nations, the lives of over 8.5 million people, with 22 million more people wounded, “The Great War” may have been stylish as hell for the British and German officers who fought in this grand exhibition of nationalism (called “patriotism” today) but it was a four-year hell for the rest of the world.
Germany — a nation that needed to be squashed like a bug for its deadly, evil opportunism — would pull a similar stunt in 1939 when it would invade Poland and start World War II, an even greater war that would leave over 52 million people dead worldwide.
Say, is there an Act Three in this great big show?
Labels:
1914,
1917,
Germany,
The Great War,
World War I
Monday, August 13, 2007
The Cold War in 25 Words or Less
After World War Two Russia and the United States pretended they were now enemies instead of the allies who helped put Hitler out of business.
Labels:
cold war,
Soviet Union,
United States
Saturday, August 04, 2007
Disco’s 15 Minutes
Future Past Disco Link |
Disco had arrived.
Disco music was much more than just another wave of night crawlers who had come out of the American nocturnal woodwork to act up, act out and carry on until three in the morning. It meant people could now dress up again when they went out. It mean that there were more musical instruments in the world than the electric guitar, harmonica and drums. There were brass horns, electronic keyboards, electronic percussion instruments now. Violins and flutes were making a comeback, only they weren’t playing stiff-necked, watered-down versions of old worn-out rock songs for elevators or mood music for a new generation of Beatniks or Hippies with no place to go as 1980 rapidly approached. Disco bands played upbeat dance music for couples to dance to while touching one another once again.
It wasn’t Glenn Miller or Tommy Dorsey but Disco was certainly something to celebrate in its own right. It’s just too damn bad that the new counterculture that invariably attached itself to Disco music eventually turned out to be twice as socially rebellious, drug-related and lascivious as the previous rock-and-roll and just plain rock culture. Beer and pot were quickly replaced by cocktails, cocaine and an unflagging desire to be bad when the world so desperately needed people to start being good again.
By 1980, all the counterculture freaks had arrived, as they always do whenever creative minds give the world something new and wonderful, and by 1982 Disco's death rattle was heard around the world. And, yes, Disco may have “died”, as its retractors are always fond of saying, but the Punk Rock, New Wave, “Grunge” Rock and other flash-in-the-pan musical fads that eventually replaced it unfortunately played host to the same counterculture of predictable moral decay and wanton behavior, just like a mutating virus that simply moves on once its host is sucked dry and all washed up.
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Israel in 25 Words or Less
In 1948 Jewish Holocaust survivors declared that their new nation of Israel would replace ancient Palestine, not caring that Palestinian Arabs already called it “home”.
Friday, July 06, 2007
Hippies Through the Keyhole
"Hippies" were often Baby Boomer malcontents who passed themselves off as the Peace & Love “flower children” of the 1960s, replacing the “too cool to care” Beatniks of the 1950s.
The label "hippie" was welcomed by a few youths but disdained by most. "Hippie" meant "hip", or "cool" but it also meant "in-the-know" about, not just the latest fashions and fads, but about important issues overlooked or ignored by many older people.
Some "hippies" were just regular kids who entered college as unfocused youths and exited college as vengeful movers and shakers without any real plans for their future or anyone else’s. They gave the rest of us long-haired college students a bad, undeserved name.
Being a "hippie" meant more than just having long hair, wearing beads and listening to sitar music. Being a "hippie" also meant taking a role in the cultural evolution of our country and our world. But, far too often, being a "hippie" was simply a cover for your intense hatred of everything that came before you.
Being a "hippie" meant more than just having long hair, wearing beads and listening to sitar music. Being a "hippie" also meant taking a role in the cultural evolution of our country and our world. But, far too often, being a "hippie" was simply a cover for your intense hatred of everything that came before you.
Author's Note: I personally loathed the word "hippie" in the late Sixties and early Seventies because I, too, was a college student with long hair and opinions about many social issues. But I also had realistic goals about my future, a respect for American traditions and a natural affection and loyalty for my parents, grandparents and family. I was also a dedicated student and a hard worker with a part-time job, like many so-called "hippies". Just so you know.
Labels:
1960s,
antisocial behavior,
freaks,
Hippies,
long hairs,
rebellion
Saturday, June 23, 2007
The Kool-Aid Stand
After the second world war a new type of business sprang up all over America. The Kool-Aid stand. This was a seasonal business run by kids trying to earn their own bubble gum money as soon as school let out for the summer.
I ran a Kool-Aid stand in front of my own house one summer before I even entered school. Mom let me make the cherry Kool-Aid all by myself. After an hour or so with no customers, I spotted a man going down into a manhole on the corner and I hastened toward him with a paper cup of the refreshing summer kid’s beverage. But I was too late. He had disappeared into the subterranean world of public utilities. But that was fine with me. I’d simply wait until the unknown man came up for air and then I’d give him my best sales pitch.
My patience paid off. About five minutes later a man stuck his head out of the manhole. It was my grandfather, working for the highway department. Undeterred, I quickly explained to him the beneficial cooling effects of cherry Kool-Aid and, after he laughed, he produced a nickel. We made the exchange and he slugged down the red drink like a prospector in the desert, dying of thirst. Afterward, he made a face and told me it had “hit the spot”. Then his head was swallowed up again by the dark hole and I went back to my Kool-Aid stand.
After that, I was pretty hot myself, so I pilfered a small drink from my own stock and tasted it. I had forgotten to add the sugar. But, according to my one and only customer that day, my very first business had been an undisputed success.
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Yuppies Through the Keyhole
Yuppies were the Young Upwardly-mobile Professionals in the 1980s and 1990s who basically used to be the hippies of the late 1960s. At some point in time, these incredibly shallow and restless folks decided to give up their pot and beads for cocaine and Rolexes.
The main purpose of being a Yuppie was to cover up your own embarrassing acts of discrimination with discriminating taste. It is suspected that many Yuppies had parents who were the freaky, pre-flower children of the Beat Generation in the 1950s. The main purpose of being a Beatnik was to wear black, listen to flute music and be inscrutable.
By the year 2000, the word Yuppie was simply replaced by the phrase “fat old fool”. The word Beatnik was, in turn, replaced by the phrase “dead fat old fool”.
Labels:
1980s,
1990s,
possessions,
self-centered,
selfish,
shallow,
snobs,
Yuppies
Sunday, May 27, 2007
NASCAR in 25 Words or Less
The National Association for Stock Car Automobile Racing, founded in 1947 at Daytona Beach, became the biggest commercial carnival outside of Las Vegas by 1999.
Labels:
auto racing,
Daytona,
Florida,
NASCAR,
racing
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
The Jointure Bandwagon
When the Korean War ended it seemed that Americans had crossed another domestic threshold. It appeared that no one wanted their kids to attend high school in their own hometown. The same post-World War Two, home front introspection that had built GI Tract housing and put women back in the kitchen had reared its head again after Korean Vets returned stateside. Only this time visionary Americans were determined to tear down all those ugly two-story hometown high schools and build “Jointures”. After all, this was a new age. Milton Berle was the new American icon. TV dinners were on their way. MacArthur had "faded away", Truman was out and most of America was already liking Ike. We had helicopters and jets now.
Jointures were super high schools that combined the student populations of several small school districts under one big, single-story roof. They were the academic shopping malls of the future, where grammar school was sold as Junior High School, with high school freshmen being reduced to the same ranks. The new Senior High School became an exclusive hangout for Sophomores, Juniors and Seniors only. There was new tax money for big lawns with lots of athletic fields and a football team backed up by a shiny new band and cheerleaders from several different towns and rural areas. All rolled into one. The wave of the future.
Unfortunately, these new academic visionaries forgot about the fact that hardly anyone could walk to school now. Most would have to be bused and that meant that seventh graders would have to rise and shine before the sun did and wait for school buses in the freezing cold and then travel ten to twenty miles or more to school whereas, before the Korean War, they just got up an hour before school, ate a leisurely and healthy breakfast and walked to school with their siblings and friends. But now they were called students and not pupils. Apparently none of the forward-looking parents and administrators had bothered to look up either word in the dictionary for its true meaning.
Before Jointures, students got to attend classes with kids they grew up with and already knew. Kids they had already made their bones with on the school playground. But no one seemed to care about that back in the 1950s. I’ve often wondered just how many visionaries on the new American school boards also snared the school bus contracts for transporting kids out of their neighborhoods and into the unknown.
Jointures were super high schools that combined the student populations of several small school districts under one big, single-story roof. They were the academic shopping malls of the future, where grammar school was sold as Junior High School, with high school freshmen being reduced to the same ranks. The new Senior High School became an exclusive hangout for Sophomores, Juniors and Seniors only. There was new tax money for big lawns with lots of athletic fields and a football team backed up by a shiny new band and cheerleaders from several different towns and rural areas. All rolled into one. The wave of the future.
Unfortunately, these new academic visionaries forgot about the fact that hardly anyone could walk to school now. Most would have to be bused and that meant that seventh graders would have to rise and shine before the sun did and wait for school buses in the freezing cold and then travel ten to twenty miles or more to school whereas, before the Korean War, they just got up an hour before school, ate a leisurely and healthy breakfast and walked to school with their siblings and friends. But now they were called students and not pupils. Apparently none of the forward-looking parents and administrators had bothered to look up either word in the dictionary for its true meaning.
Before Jointures, students got to attend classes with kids they grew up with and already knew. Kids they had already made their bones with on the school playground. But no one seemed to care about that back in the 1950s. I’ve often wondered just how many visionaries on the new American school boards also snared the school bus contracts for transporting kids out of their neighborhoods and into the unknown.
Labels:
1960s,
high school,
jointure,
school district
Thursday, May 03, 2007
“Elevator Music” in 25 Words or Less
The tacky, watered-down, string orchestra versions of mostly old Beatles hits that got piped into elevators and doctors' offices, mainly in the 1970s and 1980s.
Labels:
1970s,
1980s,
elevator music,
Musak
Saturday, April 21, 2007
The “Rat Pack” in 25 Words or Less
Three talented entertainers and two opportunistic wannabes banded together in the 1950s and 1960s to drink, womanize and suck up to the Mafia and JFK.
Labels:
Dean Martin,
Frank Sinatra,
JFK,
Joey Bishop,
Las Vegas,
Mafia,
Peter Lawford,
politics,
Rat Pack,
Sammy Davis Jr.
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
The Interstate Highway "Snow Job"
In the 1960s federal and state lawmakers, whose palms were regularly greased by special interest groups representing the American trucking industry, paved the way for the nation's first “Interstate Highway System”.
The first step in this ill-conceived program of greed and avarice was the government seizure of private land by “condemning it” and invoking the “right of eminent domain”. These corrupt and vision-less bureaucrats put thousands of productive family farms out of business with reckless abandon and cut small-town America in half so that trucks could begin hauling the goods that America’s railroads once hauled. These were the goods that the railroads delivered without endangering motorists by sharing the same road with them and at one-fourth the cost of trucking those same goods. But no one seemed to care about any of that.
Built for trucks, but showcased as modern highways for family travel, America’s interstate highways soon turned small towns all over America into empty “bedroom communities” while turning America the Beautiful into a giant concrete scar littered with unsightly billboards.
And only Lady Bird Johnson seemed to give a hoot about that.
The first step in this ill-conceived program of greed and avarice was the government seizure of private land by “condemning it” and invoking the “right of eminent domain”. These corrupt and vision-less bureaucrats put thousands of productive family farms out of business with reckless abandon and cut small-town America in half so that trucks could begin hauling the goods that America’s railroads once hauled. These were the goods that the railroads delivered without endangering motorists by sharing the same road with them and at one-fourth the cost of trucking those same goods. But no one seemed to care about any of that.
Built for trucks, but showcased as modern highways for family travel, America’s interstate highways soon turned small towns all over America into empty “bedroom communities” while turning America the Beautiful into a giant concrete scar littered with unsightly billboards.
And only Lady Bird Johnson seemed to give a hoot about that.
Labels:
1960s,
interstate highways,
right of eminent domain,
turnpike
Sunday, April 01, 2007
Ponytails & Puppy Love
The first girl I ever had a crush on back in the mid-20th Century wore her hair in a "ponytail", a hairdo that instantly gave any girl or young woman that "All-American Girl" look. And, when the girl wearing the ponytail was a high school cheerleader, it was even better. And it was even better than that if she had just the right amount of freckles on her face and in just the right places.
Back in the 1950s I was still in elementary school but that didn't keep me from being fascinated by swinging, bouncing ponytails on neighborhood girls and on women in the movies. Even the mannish Katherine Hepburn took on a whole new feminine look when she pulled back that beautiful mane of long, dark hair into a ponytail.
When the "Peace & Love" movement came along in the late 1960s, the ponytails started to disappear. They were replaced by Indian braids and long hair parted in the middle. I was the young guy on campus who longed for Sandra Dee in a ponytail and who had to settle for Janis Joplin's greasy mop instead. What a bummer. But the bummer eventually became just a bad memory. After all, what guy in the mid-1970s could resist rubbernecking when an attractive coed jogged past you with that athletic ponytail bouncing and swaying? Thank heavens for the "Me Generation" and their resurrection of the ponytail.
I'm way too old now for "Puppy Love" to strike and I long ago stopped wishing I weren't immune to its temporary effects. But whenever I see a woman of any age sporting a ponytail, whether it's on her bare head or protruding from the back of a baseball cap, you can bet I'm discreetly watching and thoroughly enjoying.
Back in the 1950s I was still in elementary school but that didn't keep me from being fascinated by swinging, bouncing ponytails on neighborhood girls and on women in the movies. Even the mannish Katherine Hepburn took on a whole new feminine look when she pulled back that beautiful mane of long, dark hair into a ponytail.
When the "Peace & Love" movement came along in the late 1960s, the ponytails started to disappear. They were replaced by Indian braids and long hair parted in the middle. I was the young guy on campus who longed for Sandra Dee in a ponytail and who had to settle for Janis Joplin's greasy mop instead. What a bummer. But the bummer eventually became just a bad memory. After all, what guy in the mid-1970s could resist rubbernecking when an attractive coed jogged past you with that athletic ponytail bouncing and swaying? Thank heavens for the "Me Generation" and their resurrection of the ponytail.
I'm way too old now for "Puppy Love" to strike and I long ago stopped wishing I weren't immune to its temporary effects. But whenever I see a woman of any age sporting a ponytail, whether it's on her bare head or protruding from the back of a baseball cap, you can bet I'm discreetly watching and thoroughly enjoying.
Labels:
1950s,
1960s,
ponytail,
puppy love,
school boy crush
Monday, March 12, 2007
“The Jet Set” in 25 Words or Less
In the 1960s and 1970s rich, vain, shallow people — mostly from Hollywood — flew everywhere in jets without any purpose and thought their shit didn’t stink.
Saturday, March 03, 2007
Lo-Tech Cartoons
I was a lucky kid. On Saturday mornings and after school I got to watch cartoons on television featuring comical and cute characters who were most often animals. Even the villains in these cartoons were cute in a kind of non-threatening way. But the most interesting thing about all the cartoons I watched on the tube as a kid was the wonderful absence of high technology. The big four cartoon makers in the 1950s and 1960s were Warner Brothers, Disney, Walter Lantz and Hanna-Barbera. A lot of their cartoons were made in the 1940s and were also aired prior to theatrical movies.
Warner Brothers cartoons were my favorite, with Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck sharing the highest honors, followed by Foghorn Leghorn, Sylvester the Cat and Yosemite Sam. The interesting thing about all these characters is that they were not really good guys. Bugs Bunny was a rabbit who loved to rattle anybody’s chain. He was a pest and a menace but you just had to like him. Daffy Duck was temperamental and vengeful but who cared? He was a laughable goof with a pronounced lisp and ideas that always backfired on him. Foghorn Leghorn was a lazy southern rooster who liked to devil a stupid, lazy dog. Sylvester was a stupid cat (with a very pronounced sloppy lisp) who could not outsmart a little, sissy, yellow bird. And Yosemite Sam was a southern outlaw who hated Bugs Bunny more than anything in the world. And none of them carried ray guns or cell phones or had pals with cyborg heads and cloned anime bodies. Hip-Hip Hooray for non-computer-generated cartoons.
I seemed to outgrow Disney’s cartoon characters when I reached puberty. Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and Goofy were fun when my feet still didn’t touch the floor at the table but they became boring as I got older. Walter Lantz’s Woody Woodpecker, Chilly Willy and Droopy weren’t very funny anyway and I actually disliked Woody Woodpecker because he was an impish little brat more than anything else. Still, they were wonderfully low-key and low-tech.
Hanna-Barbera cartoon characters took over where Disney and Walter Lantz left off. Yogi Bear and Quickdraw McGraw were hard to beat. But Huckleberry Hound and Auggie Doggie were my favorite. They were dogs. One was blue and grown up and stupid and the other was a brown beagle kid who always managed to get into trouble with his father, Doggie Daddy. Liking cute cartoon characters today would not be cool or masculine but I have no regrets about my past fondness for these kind of cartoon characters. I still like them but I can’t find them on the tube anymore.
The human exception to the cute animal character rule, as far as Hanna-Barbera was concerned, were The Flintstones and The Jetsons. I really like Fred and Barney and thought Wilma and Betty were "neat" (i.e. "cool") cartoon wives but nothing beat the space-age Jetson family for me. I liked them all and never missed an episode.
Still, with all the color and imagined three-dimensionality of my favorite cartoons, the first one I ever viewed on TV remains my favorite to this day. When I watched Captain Kangaroo in the late 1950s and they finally got around to airing another episode of Tom Terrific, I was in cartoon heaven. Tom and his dog Manfred and the arch villain Crabby Appleton were merely black stick figures on a white background but they immediately stole my kid heart and captured my boundless imagination.
Labels:
cartooning,
cartoons,
classic TV,
Disney,
Hanna-Barbera,
low-tech,
television,
Walter Lantz,
Warner Bros.
Monday, February 19, 2007
AIDS in 25 Words or Less
In the early 1980s extraterrestrial technology helped Earth’s One World Government invent and unleash this viral biological weapon upon the planet’s homosexual and African populations.
Labels:
1980s,
African,
AIDS,
biological weapon,
drug use,
homosexual,
New World Order,
One World Government,
virus
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Big Wheels
Being ambivalent about most things allows me the freedom to sit on the fence for a spell and see both sides of the pasture. Then I don't have to jump off unprepared and step in the manure. That's the way I like it.
When I look back on America’s love affair with the automobile in the mid-20th Century, what I remember most about it was that it was both a wonderful thing and a ridiculous social phenomenon at the same time. But it was a great time to be alive and your car was as much a part of who and what you were as anything else and most Americans wouldn't have it any other way.
Cars in the 1950s and 1960s were very distinctive looking and there was a lot to look at. Not like the clones today, which are first designed in the wind tunnel for fuel efficiency and then copycat designed for style, with that cowardly fear of losing a particular market share as the second driving force. Back then, however, no one gave a damn about gas mileage and, back in the Fifties and Sixties, being different was an automaker’s key to marketing success.
Fins were in, especially on Cadillacs, Chryslers and Plymouths, despite the fact that they served no aerodynamic function whatsoever. But they looked really cool to me, as a kid growing up at that time, like fins on a rocket ship. Today they would look nothing but ridiculous but I’d love to see them make a comeback. Along with the fender. And, while they’re at it, they might as well throw in the running board. It made a great step for kids and older people.
And, man, did these big, boxy babies have real power steering and power brakes or what? You could literally stop on a dime if you touched that big-ass brake with anything more than just your toe. And you could steer a 1962 Pontiac Catalina (pictured) with only one finger. I once saw a man steer his 1962 Dodge Coronet with just his nose.
A lot of the cars in the 1950s and 1960s also rode like Cadillacs. Hell, just about all of them. They had big, sixteen-inch, bias-ply tires, a massive chassis and thick-rolled bodies that made some of these cars weigh in at two tons or more. I could lay down in the back seat of the 1968 Buick Wildcat I bought in 1980 as a grown man. And my head and feet never touched either door.
I miss the bench seat in front and the shifter on the steering column. That’s back in the days when the ignition key went into a slot on the dashboard. Right next to the Delco radio and the glove compartment with a lock on the door and a light inside. It was big enough to hold your lunch.
I think about those cars a lot these days and I pine away for one every time I squeeze into my aging 2000 Daewoo Lanos and bump my head on the rearview mirror and skin my knee on the door handle. But at least it still hasn’t rusted in the seven years I’ve been driving it. And that’s worth an awful lot to me.
When I look back on America’s love affair with the automobile in the mid-20th Century, what I remember most about it was that it was both a wonderful thing and a ridiculous social phenomenon at the same time. But it was a great time to be alive and your car was as much a part of who and what you were as anything else and most Americans wouldn't have it any other way.
Cars in the 1950s and 1960s were very distinctive looking and there was a lot to look at. Not like the clones today, which are first designed in the wind tunnel for fuel efficiency and then copycat designed for style, with that cowardly fear of losing a particular market share as the second driving force. Back then, however, no one gave a damn about gas mileage and, back in the Fifties and Sixties, being different was an automaker’s key to marketing success.
Fins were in, especially on Cadillacs, Chryslers and Plymouths, despite the fact that they served no aerodynamic function whatsoever. But they looked really cool to me, as a kid growing up at that time, like fins on a rocket ship. Today they would look nothing but ridiculous but I’d love to see them make a comeback. Along with the fender. And, while they’re at it, they might as well throw in the running board. It made a great step for kids and older people.
And, man, did these big, boxy babies have real power steering and power brakes or what? You could literally stop on a dime if you touched that big-ass brake with anything more than just your toe. And you could steer a 1962 Pontiac Catalina (pictured) with only one finger. I once saw a man steer his 1962 Dodge Coronet with just his nose.
A lot of the cars in the 1950s and 1960s also rode like Cadillacs. Hell, just about all of them. They had big, sixteen-inch, bias-ply tires, a massive chassis and thick-rolled bodies that made some of these cars weigh in at two tons or more. I could lay down in the back seat of the 1968 Buick Wildcat I bought in 1980 as a grown man. And my head and feet never touched either door.
I miss the bench seat in front and the shifter on the steering column. That’s back in the days when the ignition key went into a slot on the dashboard. Right next to the Delco radio and the glove compartment with a lock on the door and a light inside. It was big enough to hold your lunch.
I think about those cars a lot these days and I pine away for one every time I squeeze into my aging 2000 Daewoo Lanos and bump my head on the rearview mirror and skin my knee on the door handle. But at least it still hasn’t rusted in the seven years I’ve been driving it. And that’s worth an awful lot to me.
Labels:
1950s,
1960s,
automobiles,
Cadillac,
muscle cars,
Plymouth,
Pontiac,
power steering
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Vietnam in 25 Words or Less
Under President Eisenhower, The United States entered into a twenty-year chess game with the Soviet Union in southeast Asia, squandering American lives for wartime prosperity.
Monday, January 01, 2007
A Real Meal Deal
When I was in college I used to frequent a restaurant that was right across the street from campus. I loved their breakfast specials and the one I usually ordered was two eggs over easy, two strips of bacon, toast and jelly, orange juice and coffee. All that for a whopping 69 cents.
That’s right. A complete sit-down breakfast for 69 cents. Of course, that was around 1970.
The restaurant I’m talking about is no longer there but a comparable breakfast anywhere else these days would cost ten times that much. Not twice that or five times that, which would not be way out of line after 37 years of inflation. No, a ten-fold price increase that reflects our willingness to swallow just about anything nowadays.
Hell, no wonder I rarely eat breakfast out anymore.
That’s right. A complete sit-down breakfast for 69 cents. Of course, that was around 1970.
The restaurant I’m talking about is no longer there but a comparable breakfast anywhere else these days would cost ten times that much. Not twice that or five times that, which would not be way out of line after 37 years of inflation. No, a ten-fold price increase that reflects our willingness to swallow just about anything nowadays.
Hell, no wonder I rarely eat breakfast out anymore.
Labels:
1970,
breakfast,
collegiate,
meal,
nostalgia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)